Abstract
This article studies mission within the context of traditional Nordic national churches. In the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Norway, a state church until 2012, eighty percent of all congregations have formal agreements with a mission organization to support a project abroad. Given their prevalence, these agreements need empirical investigation as they provide access to congregational understandings and their practicing of mission. From the perspective of missiology and organization theory, this article asks: What do the mission agreements accomplish in the congregations, and how do the congregations use the agreements? Based on interviews in six congregations, our analysis shows that the function of the agreements depends on the engagement of individual volunteers and employees. Engagement is high when projects are perceived as concrete and diaconal and are incorporated into congregations’ organizational structures and key activities. Mission is primarily understood as supporting projects in the global south and as sharing the Christian faith with churches in other countries.
References
Austnaberg, H. (2014). Engaging Norwegian Youth in Mission. An Empirical Study. Mission Studies, 82-96.
Austnaberg, H., and Haug, K. S. (2013). Engasjement og deltakelse. Misjon i trosopplæringens ungdomsfase. [Engagement and participation. Mission in the youth phase of Christian education]. Trondheim: Akademika.
Bach Nikolajsen, J., Haug, K. S., Thoresen, F.-O., and Eskilt, I. (2022). Missiologi: en innføring [Missiologi. An introduction]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
Berentsen, J.-M., Tomod Engelsviken, T. and Jørgensen, K. (1994). Missiologi i dag. [Missiology today]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Bjørdal, M. (2005). Misjonalt ungdomsarbeid i Norge - ansatser til en skisse. [Missional youth work in Norway – a preliminary scetch]. Norsk Tidsskrift for Misjon, 59(3), 199-207.
Boxenbaum, E., and Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, and R. Meyer, (eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 79-104.
Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy. København: Abstract.
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., and Røvik, K. A. (2015). Organisasjonsteori for offentlig sektor. Instrument, kultur, myte. [Organization theory for the public sector. Instrument, culture, and myth]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Czarniawska, B., and Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of Ideas. In B. Czarniawska, and G. Sevon, (eds.), Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter, 13-46.
Den norske kirke. En misjonerende kirke. [A missional church]. Oslo: Kirkerådet.
Den norske kirke. (2021). Mer himmel på jord. [More heavan on earth]. Oslo: Kirkerådet.
DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Ekenes, R. (2011). Misjon til forandring. Refleksjoner og visjoner fra Lausanne III. [Mission and change. Reflections and vision from Lusanne III]. Skjetten: Hermon forlag.
Engelsviken, T. (2004). Den misjonale kirke og utfordringen fra kirken i sør. [The missional church and the challenge from the church in the south]. In T. Engelsviken and K. O. Sannes, (eds.), Hva vil det si å være kirke? Kirkens vesen og oppdrag. [What does it mean being church? The nature and the mission of the church]. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk forlag, 69-92.
Hanssen, O. C. (2004). Fra vedlikehold til misjon. Noen perspektiver på menighetsfornyelse og menighetsutvikling i England. [From maintanence to mission. Some perspectives on church renewing and congregational development in England]. Halvårsskrift for praktisk teologi, 21(2), 26-35.
Haug, K. S. (2015). Folkekirken som misjonerende kirke. [The national church as a missional church]. In S. Dietrich, H. Elstad, B. Fagerli, and V. L. Haanes, (eds.), Folkekirke nå. Oslo: Verbum, 179-186.
Hegstad, H. (2004). Misjonerende folkekirke. Selvmotsigelse eller mulighet? [Missional national church]. Norsk Tidsskrift for Misjon(4), 213-224.
Jørgensen, K. (2004). Trenger kirken omvendelse? På vei mot en misjonal ekklesiologi. [Does the church needs conversion? Towards a missional ecclesiology]. In T. Engelsviken, and K. O. Sannes, (eds.), Hva vil det si å være kirke? Kirkens vesen og oppdrag. Trondheim: Tapir Akademisk forlag, 51-68.
Kirkemøtet. (2005). KM 5/05 En misjonerende kirke. Innstilling fra kirkemøtekomité F. [A missional church. Recommandation from church synod committee F]. Oslo: Kirkerådet.
Kirkemøtet. (2012). KM 07/12 Misjon til forandring. Utfordringene fra Edinburgh 2010. [Mission for change. The challenges from Edinburgh 2010]. Oslo: Kirkerådet.
Kirkemøtet. (2021). Den norske kirkes globale oppdrag. [The global mission of the Church of Norway]. Oslo: Kirkerådet.
Kvale, S., and Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews. Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. (2. ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Landgren, K. G. (2013). Folkkyrka och mission i en luthersk kontext. Missionell missionsförståelse i relation till luthersk kyrkoförståelse och folkkyrkotanken. [National church and mission in a Lutheran context. Missional understandning of mission in relation to Lutheran understanding of the Church and the national church concept]. (Master thesis, Norwegian School of theology, religion and society). Oslo: Norwegian School of theology, religion and society.
Meyer, J. W., and Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Myklebust, O. G. (1972). Misjonskunnskap. En innføring. [Missiology. An introduction]. Oslo: Menighetsfakultetet.
Røvik, K. A. (1998). Moderne organisasjoner. Trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved tusenårsskiftet. [Modern organizations. Trends in organization thought at the tide of the milennium]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Røvik, K. A. (2007). Trender og translasjoner. Ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon. [Trends and translations. Ideas forming the organization fo the 20th century]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Sahlin, K., and Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, and R. Meyer, (eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 218-242.
Scott, R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identity. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Sirris, S., and Askeland, H. (2021). Kirkelig organisering og ledelse. Et verdibasert og praksisorientert perspektiv. [Church organizing and leadership. A values-based and practice-oriented perspective]. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
Sirris, S., Askeland, H., Angell, O. H., Austnaberg, H., Eriksen, S. S., Haugen, H. M., and Lindheim, T. (2020). Møte, vokse, dele. Evaluering av Samarbeid menighet og misjon (SMM). [Meet, grow, share. Evaluation of Collaboration congregation and mission (CMM)]. Oslo: VID vitenskapelige høgskole.
Aano, K. (2010). Her gjeld det å halda ting saman! Forkynning, diakoni og rettferd i eit teologisk perspektiv. [Now it is important to keep things together! Preaching, diaconia and justice in a theological perspectives]. Norsk tidsskrift for misjonsvitenskap/Norwegian Journal of Missiology, 64(1-2), 41-56.
Aano, K. (2015). Folkekyrkja og organisasjonane. Eit misjonalt frigjeringsprosjekt. [National church and the organizations. A missional liberation project]. In S. Dietrich, H. Elstad, B. Fagerli, and V. L. Hånes, (eds.), Folkekirke nå. Oslo: Verbum akademisk, 119-127.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Stephen Sirris, Hans Austnaberg